|
|
|
|
Bhopal Gas tradegy site: memory and interventions in landscapes of urban tragedy
Ref.: 195
Key theme:
03 Visual integrity of historic urban landscapes
Date of reception:
18/11/2008
AUTHORS (*Main author)
BALLAL, Amritha
* (India)
-
SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE,
ABSTRACT
On the night of December 3rd 1984, the Union Carbide Plant in the city of Bhopal, India, became the site of one of the world's greatest
industrial tragedies- The Bhopal Gas Tragedy. Today the former factory site stands abandoned and neglected. The settlements around
the factory, some of the poorest in Bhopal, inhabit highly toxic land which is still to be decontaminated after 25 years of the tragedy; the
ground water is poisoned from leached chemicals; there is no supply of running water. The death toll now stands close to 20,000.
Bhopal is yet to come to terms with being synonymous with this horrific tragedy, a denial manifested by years of neglect of the site. At
the same time, for the communities affected by the tragedy the site has become the heart of years of grass root activism for justice. In
2006 I became involved in this highly complex issue as the architect for the Bhopal Gas Tragedy Memorial, after winning a national
design competition for the same. This paper shares my teams on ground experience of a site whose legacy in India both reflects
and has helped to shape modern society and consequently proves to be of great value for the understanding of our current way of life1.
In doing so it raises pertinent questions that identify with the conferences prime construct - What is a Historic Urban Landscape (HUL)?
How can contemporary architecture be integrated harmoniously in a Historic Urban Landscape? What is a meaningful or
significant contemporary architecture in a Historic Urban Landscape? The proposal rests the brief of `memorializing' the
overwhelming context of the site on the most visible and tangible relic of the tragedy- the existing factory building itself- in the process
avoiding inflicting alien commemorative gestures on a highly sensitive site. Preservation the physical integrity of the
factory structure and retaining its visual dominance of the low lying skyline of north Bhopal is one of the key aspects of the
proposal. The design interventions integrate with the existing context visually and programmatically towards revitalization of the entire
precinct. The objective is to visually, physically, culturally and emotionally re-integrate the landscape with Bhopal
City.
Implementation of the proposal in the absence of any existing policy on protection and management of urban industrial
heritage sites has been immensely challenging. While parallels might be drawn with other case studies such as Hiroshima in Japan and
in the rehabilitation of adoned steel factories of Germany, Bhopal faces added complexities due to the economic and socio- political
compulsions unique to third world urban scenarios. The ongoing process has to be flexible and inclusive to bridge largely
conflicting viewpoints of the various stakeholders, from the victims to the state, who lay claim to the site. To overcome a daunting
lack of administrative will, media and non governmental organizations have been engaged to spread public awareness. In the face of
constant vandalism the local community based organizations have been instrumental in helping to protect and document the complex.
One of the most crucial aspects has been to convince the administration that the structure needn't be dismantled in order to be
decontaminated. The matter is under litigation and we have extensively used the databank of ICOMOS and TICCIH on industrial
and modern heritage to make our case for balancing heritage with environmental concerns. Bhopal, through the magnitude of its
complexity and context, will be instrumental in setting a precedent for addressing issues of remediation and revitalization of scarred
landscapes and urban voids, in India and in similar third world urban settings through an inclusive, participatory
process.
Figure 1 : The Abandoned Union Carbide Factory at Bhopal, the morning after the Gas leak. Photo by Raghu
Rai Figure 2: View of the existing Factory and post the proposed conservation
REFERENCES
a) The theme of the 12th International Seminar of Forum UNESCO University and Heritage (FUUH) b) Commemorating Bhopal,
Moulshri Joshi, Our Modern, The mAAN Sixth International Conference Proceeding , 2006 c) Matters of Conscience ( Archives ),
International Coalition of Sites of Conscience d) The Bhopal Legacy, Greenpeace Report, Greenpeace Research Laboratories, Exeter
1999 e) Industrial Patrimony, Maria Teresa Pontois, TICCIH ( The International Committee for the Conservation of Industrial Heritage)
2008 f) The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the Industrial Heritage , TICCIH ( The International Committee for the Conservation of Industrial
Heritage), 2003 g) Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage, Modern Heritage Programme, UNESCO World Heritage
Center, 2003 h) Belgium, Environment and Heritage, ICOMOS Belgium, Heritage at Risk, ICOMOS, 2004-2005 i) Hope and Rust, Re
Interpreting the Industrial Place in the late Twentieth Century, Anna Storm, Division of History of Science and Technology, Royal Institute of
Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2008 j) Preservation and Re-use of the Blast Furnace Site UNESCO World Heritage
Site Völklingen Ironworks" World Heritage Sites of the 20th Century German Case Studies, Heritage at Risk Special, ICOMOS, 2006
|
|