Symbolic Integrity of Historic Urban Landscapes: The Forgotten Dimension in Urban Conservation

Ref.: 175
Key theme: 02 Functional integrity of historic urban landscapes
Date of reception: 15/11/2008

AUTHORS (*Main author)

SILVA, Kapila Dharmasena * (United States of America) - University of Kansas

ABSTRACT

This paper argues that symbolic content or meanings associated with environments are crucial to the success of preservation of historic architecture and development of contemporary architecture in historic urban contexts. Making the world around us meaningful by associating the environment with various culturally or personally derived meanings is a most fundamental need for human existence. Thus communicating appropriate meanings to its inhabitants is perhaps the most significant function of a place. For a new building to be an integral part of a historic environment, its associated meanings should be compatible with the symbolic dimensions historically embedded with the place. As societies transform over time, these environmental meanings also transform. It is essential, therefore, to understand the historic place meanings, how they have transformed into new meanings, and how to keep the symbolic integrity of the place in both conservation and contemporary designs within the historic place. The symbolic dimension becomes critical when we focus on conserving South and Southeast Asian historic cities in particular, as they are a product of timeless Hindu and Buddhist cosmological models. The historic fabric, monuments, cultural and religious institutions, ritual events, and the daily life in these cities are closely related to the symbolism underlying the historic place, and is thus of prime importance in the conservation and urban development programs. Yet, the symbolic integrity of historic urban landscapes is the least understood and largely forgotten dimension in the contemporary inquiry of conservation, which has relegated its concern simply to the formal, visual, material, and structural integrity of the historic fabric. When addressed properly, meanings of a place help integrating the physical, functional, and visual dimensions of the historic town as well as sustaining the political, economic, and social dimensions of the communities. This
presentation will make a case for paying attention to the symbolic dimension of historic towns, discussing what it is, how it binds all other dimensions of a place together, how to identify it, how it will guide new designs in old contexts, and how it can be instrumental in establishing socio-economic sustainability of historic urban landscapes. To illustrate this argument, the paper will discuss the World Heritage towns of Bhaktapur in Nepal and Kandy in Sri Lanka as examples.

REFERENCES

Duncan, J. S. (1990). The city as text: The politics of landscape interpretation in the Kandyan kingdom. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Gelner, D. N. (1992) Monk, household, and Tantric priest: Newar Buddhism and its hierarchy of ritual. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gray, J. (2006) Domestic Mandala: Architecture of life world in Nepal. Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing.
Gutschow, N. & Michaels, A. (2005) Handling death: The dynamics of death and ancestor rituals among the Newars of Bhaktapur, Nepal. Wiesbaden, Germany: Harrassowitz.
Levy, R. I. (1991) Mesocosm: Hinduism and the organization of a traditional Newar city in Nepal. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lienhard, S. (Ed.) (1996). Change and continuity: Studies in the Nepalese culture of the Kathmandu Valley. Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso.
Logan, W. S. (Ed.). (2002). The disappearing `Asian' city: Protecting Asia's urban heritage in a globalizing world. New York: The Oxford University Press.
Lowenthal, D. (1975). Past time, present place: Landscape and memory. The Geographical Review, LXV(1), 1-36.
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Rapoport, A. (1990b). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach (2nd ed.). Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.
Rapoport, A. (2005). Culture, architecture, design. Chicago: Locke Science Publishing.
Regmi, R. R. (1993). Kathmandu, Ptan & Bhaktapur: An archaeological anthropology of the royal cities of the Kathmandu Valley. Jaipur, India: Nirala Publications.
Roveda, V. (2006) Images of the Gods: Khmer mythology in Cambodia, Loas, and Thailand. Warren, CT, USA: Floating World Editions.
Silva, K.D. (2004). Mapping Meanings in the City Image: Towards Preserving the Imageability of Urban Cultural Landscapes. Unpublished PhD Dissertation: University of Wisconsin ­ Milwaukee.
Silva, K.D. (2006) Conserving Asian Urban Heritage: The need for re-conceptualizing the value-based Management approach (pp.16-23) in Siriwan Silapacharanan & Jeffrey Campbell (eds.) Asian Approaches to Conservation. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University.
Slusser, M. S. (1982) Nepal Mandala: A cultural study of the Kathmandu Valley. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Smith, W. W. (Ed.) (1978) Mythological history of the Nepal Valley from Svaymbhu Purana. Kathmandu, Nepal: Avalok Publishers.
Vergati, A. (2002) Gods, men and territory: Society and culture in Kathmandu Valley. New Delhi, India: Manohar Publishers.